Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot Eurchuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 14:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Elliot Eurchuk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Obviously a tragic case, and it appears that the death and subsequent coroner's report has generated a reasonable amount of press coverage. However, this appears to be one of those special cases of WP:BLP1E - an individual who is notable only for their death. There is always potential for an individual who dies tragically to gain posthumous notability based on enduring significance and coverage, but I'm not yet seeing that here so it is WP:TOOSOON. For now, it appears to fail WP:GNG, WP:EVENTCRIT. Hugsyrup 13:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing here rises above the level of routine news coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete:Fails WP:BLP1E and WP:GNG.  N0nsensical.system (err0r?)(.log) 10:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. A minor blip in the news. Or move to Wikinews? Ambrosiawater (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - horrible, but far too common. Bearian (talk) 01:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.