Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot Loney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Elliot Loney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:N Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 04:30, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This could be speedily deleted. No legitimate assertion of notability and could not find any widespread coverage to meet WP:BLP. Mkdw talk 06:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find any coverage. Getting lots of YouTube views is impressive, but it doesn't always translate into wider media coverage necessary to meet WP:WEB or WP:GNG. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of notability. It's borderline, but the claim of 2 Million+ Youtube views is a claim of notability, thin though it may be. Now, if there were sources that discussed his youtube stardom, we might have an article - but I can't find anything, really. This might also be a case for WP:USUAL; he seems to be early in his career. If he does become notable, then an article would be a no-brainer. But we're not there yet. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 22:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of significant coverage and not meeting WP:ENT, despite the NUMBER of Youtube hits, there are Youtube pages and channels with FAR more "hits", Facebook pages with far more "likes", and creators with far more coverage.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.