Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot Valenstein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. causa sui (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Elliot Valenstein

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient content to warrant keeping the article. -- Forward  Unto   Dawn  12:42, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep based on totally invalid nomination criterion (see WP:DEL-REASON and WP:TOOLITTLE). Subject of article easily passes WP:PROF with a h-index of 37, by my count. His book Great and Desperate Cures: The Rise and Decline of psychosurgery and other Radical Treatments for Mental Illness has over 400 citations. -- 202.124.74.2 (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. WoS shows h-index of 30 and WorldCat shows enormous holdings of his many books: 1302, 1181, 913, 741, 528, 379, ... Evidence of notability is conclusive and it would be very good form here for nom to withdraw this AfD before lots of time is wasted on it. Thanks! Agricola44 (talk) 15:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC).
 * Speedy keep this is a silly nomination. Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.