Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliptic Curve DSA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep. This is very notable, verifiable, and its not blatant advertising. &mdash; Maggot Syn 15:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Elliptic Curve DSA

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant advertising Mr. E. Sánchez  Wanna know my story?/ Share yours with me! 18:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep its a long way over my head - but it seems to be a theory rather than a product and notable - external links might need checking but I can't see how the article itself is advertising. -Hunting dog (talk) 18:50, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep ECDSA is one of three algorithms included in NISTs digital signature standard. 85.1.107.231 (talk) 18:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep It cannot be advertising because the subject of the article is neither a company nor a product. The article is about a standard. If a particular item in the article is linkspam, it should just be removed and not brought to AfD. Jim Miller (talk) 19:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep How can theories be "blatant advertising"? As Jim Miller Jr. said, an innapropriate external link or two is not cause for an AfD.  Just be bold and remove it.  Shapiros10  contact me My work  21:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong/speedy keep. I don't know if this is a bad faith nomination or just misunderstanding on the part of the nominator, but it's obviously notable, and it isn't spam because that just wouldn't make sense; how can you spam an encryption standard?  Celarnor Talk to me  05:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, the term should be familiar to anyone who has studied crypto recently. WillOakland (talk) 08:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.