Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellyn Satter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Ellyn Satter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person, who wrote a few books. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No significant coverage found about her or her books - which appear to be self-published. --MelanieN (talk) 03:43, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I have found some mentions of her work in reliable sources, such as Montana Office of Public Instruction, and The Federalist. One of her books is held in about 750 libraries in WorldCat . I see possible notability in her future, but not at this time. LaMona (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I should add my analysis of the refs: #1 She writes for Web MD, so this is her bio, probably written by her #2 mention only #3 Amazon! #4 minor publication #5 someone's blog #6 minor publication. LaMona (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.