Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elma S. Beganovich (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  03:12, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Elma S. Beganovich
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is partly procedural since the three !voters for keep at the previous AFD five years ago where all subsequently blocked as socks. Even despite that, I am also not seeing coverage in reliable sources as required to meet WP:BIO. SmartSE (talk) 19:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SmartSE (talk) 19:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Bosnia and Herzegovina,  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. A Forbes contributor piece and an interview in Marie Claire, and this . None of which is extensive coverage. I'd give it a weak keep if we had one decent source, but I don't see any. Oaktree b (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Two of the deletes are "per nom", which doesn't address the keep argument. Two of the delete arguments are substantial, in that they attempt to analyze available sources. Both were before the keep argument, and therefore these sources should be discussed before consensus is determined. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 01:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Although I have no enthusiasm for the subject of this article, there are some fairly solid sources for the person and the company she founded. I removed a lot of the citations that did not support the statements they followed. A lot of the sources were their promotions of various brands and trends; since that is what they actually do for their work, those sources are not about them even though they are featured in the articles. There is a Google book with 3.5 pages about her and that might support some of the factual information. I'm unclear whether the articles by Áine Cain are independent so I'm letting those stay. Lamona (talk) 06:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:17, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. The article subject doesn’t have sufficient WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:NOTABILITY per WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. If the subject had evidence of notability, I would say keep the article, but that evidence of notability just isn’t there. Shawn Teller (talk) 02:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.