Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elmer Morales


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Elmer Morales

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are mostly single line mentions. red dogsix (talk) 14:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  15:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Multiple reliable sources present 1, 2, 3, All his works appear notable. M assiveYR   ♠  16:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - Not exactly, "...in-depth, non-trivial support." red dogsix (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as per nom. None of the claims give a presumption of notability, and none of the references are significant coverage of him. For example, one reference is "Someone Created a Damn Daniel App"; he is (one of) the someones and "Elmer Morales, the founder of Koder" is the entirely of the coverage. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 20:07, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom - fails WP:GNG. --  Dane talk  00:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  A  Train talk 07:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Daaamn Daniel! All the coverage listed is about the app, not the subject. At best, it's passing mentions of the subject. I did a quick BEFORE, and didn't see anything more promising. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  03:32, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete owing to a lack of WP:SIGCOV about the man.--Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.