Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elmsleigh Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Salvio 10:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Elmsleigh Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." The subject does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE coverage of events and directory style listings.  // Timothy ::  talk  02:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  02:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  02:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:


 * This article had just been created three days prior to nomination. Give the article creator,, time to build it out first. As WP:BEFORE C2 suggests, "If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.". Keep for now with no prejudice against AfD in 6-12 months if the article has not improved enough. Raymie (t • c) 06:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Reply: The article has existed long enough to add two sources demonstrating notability. No objection to Drafting.  // Timothy ::  talk  06:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


 * draftify - something being new isn't sufficient for it to stay in mainspace. Suggest moving to draft/userspace for incubation. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.