Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elnec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Elnec

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The domain is spam, and also promoting company products, Advertising. Removed PROD. Wuh Wuz  Dat  14:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral I wouldn't go so far as to call it spam, but I'm not seeing much in the way of reliable sources either. I'd lean slightly toward delete but maybe someone in the field can shed some more light. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:30, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Please consider also that products of the company are sold in the US and UK under different brand names - as "Dataman" and "B&K Precision" - so brand "Elnec" may not be well known there, but for sure is present. Elnec products are used by worldwide Electronics manufacturetrs as Foxcon, Samsung, Acer, etc. Products are also recommended by many chip producers:*Microchip reference, STMicroelectronics reference eg., EM microelectronics reference, XILINX reference, etc. - (may not good references for the article). Pssstpssst (talk) 12:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  06:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.