Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eloise Broady DeJoria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Eloise Broady DeJoria

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Actress with a trivial, unnoticed career, then a housewife that did charity work. That's it. There is next to nothing in support of her notability. Yet another promotional text. -The Gnome (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:43, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: While I definitely agree that the article reads like a promotion and needs overhauling, she seems to have had quite a few credited roles in a number of films, according to her imdb page. ExRat (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the contribution, ExRat. Pls check out WP:IMDB-EL. Additionally, WP:NACTOR defines the kind of presence in cinema that a person must have had in order for that person to merit a Wikipedia article. -The Gnome (talk) 08:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I'm aware of both, thanks. I've been an editor for over 15 years. I wasn't stating imdb be used as a reference. I was stating that based on her imbd page, she has actually had a number of prominent roles in feature films. Regardless, I'm not that invested in whether the article stays or is deleted. ExRat (talk) 00:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 21:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I rewrote the article and added sources. Particularly, I think that her film roles are more worth describing than numerous charities, but since the article is in AFD category, I did not delete any. There are mutiple significant roles - Weekend at Bernie's (see ), Grand Champion,  The Dukes. She even appeared in a film with an impressive cast as herself. Кирилл С1 (talk) 09:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep significant roles and per the changes made it proves notability. Also agree that film work is more notable. FiddleheadLady (talk) 19:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on some of her roles, this is a keep. Lesliechin1 (talk) 23:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.