Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elon Effect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 19:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Elon Effect

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

If one Googles "Elon effect", the top hits have nothing to do with the @elonjet account but instead discuss Musk's impact on the price of various cryptocurrencies. I don't see much there to build a non-stub article but if there is, we might as well start from scratch because "Elon effect" is not, as the article currently suggests, used primarily to denote a variant of the Streisand effect. Pichpich (talk) 19:17, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources suggest that the term is used in the way suggested by the article. Delete as original research. A change of scope may be warranted, but there is no indication that it would be long enough of an article to justify not editing a section about it into the parent Elon Musk article (with a title of "Effects on cryptocurrency markets" or similar) and creating a redirect instead. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 21:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Entirely made up. The Streisand effect is the correct term and that article exists. Lamona (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete, there is not a lot of substance to the article and there has not been enough examples or relevance for it to warrant a wikipedia page write-up. HelplessBystander (talk) 13:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism,  and Popular culture. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 17:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete or draftify/rewrite. The Elon Effect in the context of cryptocurrencies may be notable (FT is RS, for example), but for inexclipable reason the author of this chose to apply this term to the jet tracking controversy... WP:TNT likely applies, ping me if some tries to salvage it. If the author asks for draftication, we could also do this.
 * Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly not notable. Term appears to be a meme/made up, little long-term impact, and clearly doesn't meet standards of notability. KlayCax (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.