Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eloptic energy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 23:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Eloptic energy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Simply non-notable. One patent and no outside recogntion. ScienceApologist (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless article gets some sources - good sources. Springnuts (talk) 23:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  00:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources at all? Shame. Its a good name. Delete at this time. Lawrence Cohen  00:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * delete Practically nonsense. DGG (talk) 21:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.