Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsass-Lothringen (book series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Elsass-Lothringen (book series)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about an unpublished series of eight science fiction books, apparently posted by their author. It seems only the first two books have even been written: publication date is given as 2014. No independent source is cited, and I can find none (note that "Elsass-Lothringen" gives plenty of hits because it is the German for "Alsace-Lorraine"). Fails Notability (books)#Not yet published books. PROD removed by author. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 08:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  —JohnCD (talk) 09:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No sources, comprehensive fail of WP:BK.  Definite A9 were it a record. Tevildo (talk) 09:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Obviously not notable and largely speculative. I also smell a certain amount of POV-pushing, based on the heavy weighting of the names in the (incoherent) storyline towards imperial German themes. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7 and A9 G11 Alex Bakharev (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, A7 applies only to people, organizations and web content, explicitly excluding "articles about their books, albums, software and so on", and A9 covers only musical recordings. JohnCD (talk) 12:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete--information about books that don't exist is difficult to verify. One hopes that the author of the books has a better grasp of grammar than the author of the article. Drmies (talk) 05:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.