Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elson Haas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:17, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Elson Haas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is on a subject that does not meet GNG or BLP. The sources in the article are not reliable and do not cover the guy in depth. I did a Google search for additional sources but found only syndicated content that mention the guy's opinion on healthy eating, but none mention him in depth either. Delta13C (talk) 14:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I am unable to find any reliable source on the claims made about his notability. --allthefoxes (Talk) 17:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as none of the current article even suggests fully satisfying the applicable notability guidelines and the best my searches found were only a few links here and there, nothing outstanding. Notifying who asks to be notified of these subject AfDs as he has familiar insight.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. possibly speedy delete as hopelessly promotional. he's not notable under WP:PROF but there is a faint  possibility he might be a notable author . But if som, the article will need starting over. The only practical o thing do do with this is to delete it.  DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.