Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elton Dharry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) Dea  db  eef  02:09, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Elton Dharry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer - does not meet either WP:NBOX or WP:GNG. There is an IBF title in the future apparently but this is not referenced and in any case would make this WP:TOOSOON. The references in the article are just titles with no indication where they are from. Peter Rehse (talk) 08:36, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 08:36, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete I think you could argue he technically meets WP:NBOX with his Caribbean title, but I'm having a hard time voting to keep this article. He defended his title against a fighter with a 2-2 record which tells me it's not much of a title (the WBC hands them out like candy).  His Guyanaese title was won against a fighter who'd won 5 of his 20 fights.  Added to the lack of coverage to meet WP:GNG, this determined my vote.  Additional info could change my mind.Mdtemp (talk) 18:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:40, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.