Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eluppaiyur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Obviously going nowhere (non-admin closure) Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 12:43, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Eluppaiyur

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Completely unsourced mess. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 18:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Looks like areal population center to me.  Article being a mess is not a reason for AfD, but to improve it.  Nominated an article of a verified village within an hour of article creation  is ill-advised.  I've wikified it somewhat. --Oakshade (talk) 06:14, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - It needs a lot of work I agree, but that's no reason to delete. -- WikHead (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: populated place, verified (Iluppaiyur) on Google map. Pam  D  07:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Nominator may want to withdraw now that sources have been shown to verify the place. Silver  seren C 07:50, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Convert to redirect (actually I've WP:BOLDly done so, after wasting my time on improving it a bit before going to create a redirect from the alternative spelling and finding the long-established article at Iluppaiyur, in order to save anyone else wasting time similarly). I've left the AfD template and hope that an admin will close this AfD ASAP. Pam  D  11:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * All sorts of confusion going on, we now have a dab page at Iluppaiyur and a redirect at Eluppaiyur, and another editor has removed the AfD template which I carefully left behind. Pam  D  12:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.