Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvenbaath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - brenneman  style="color:#000000;" title="Admin actions">{L} 08:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Elvenbaath
Non-notable webcomic. 769 Google hits. Delete. DMG413 15:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This has been listed on WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 15:51, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn webcomic. --Ter e nce Ong 16:03, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sign of notability, does not appear to meet WP:WEB. -- Dragonfiend 20:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. totally non-notable. Nortelrye 23:14, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, vanity, comicscruft, etc...--Jersey Devil 02:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: 769 google hits sounds good, article is well fleshed out. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 02:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: Well written and informative article. Will grow with time. --User:Bodhisattva.sim
 * Keep. It's notable and well-written. The nominator hasn't demonstrated that there's any downside to having this article here in Wikipedia. Jimpartame 02:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * What, in your opinion, points to this webcomic being notable? Nothing in the article seems to suggest that it is notable to me. The article goes into great detail on this webcomic's characters and plot, but mentions no mainstream media coverage, prestigious awards won, etc. What is it that is notable about this webcomic? -- Dragonfiend 03:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * One of the top three in the Lazy Grind so far, for a start. I'd have no objection to moving this article to my userspace and restoring it if and when he actually wins, though. Sound good to you? I mean, I can understand if "one out of three" isn't notable enough for you. Jimpartame 04:48, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * delete article fails to estabilish notability, no obvious grounds for notability, fails WP:WEB Pete.Hurd 04:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If you take a look at the cartoonist's blog, it's clear he created article. Initially the "Wiki" link on the Elvenbaath site pointed here, but he's since switched it to Comixpedia, which is more appropriate for the time being.  I don't think winning an Iron Man-style challenge will make this webcomic notable, but even if it does, we'd have to rewrite it from scratch to avoid WP:VANITY. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 13:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable, even if it wins. I do not get so many Google hits either, 478 and 54 are unique. - Hahnch  e  n 13:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as minor webcomic. Stifle (talk) 23:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.