Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvir Melunović


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Brachy 08  (Talk)  (Contribs)  09:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Elvir Melunović

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, and WP:LEAD. Also has no reliable sources  Brachy 08  (Let’s Have A Kiki,  I Wanna Have a Kiki)  02:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Brachy 08   (Let’s Have A Kiki,  I Wanna Have a Kiki)  02:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Serbia, Switzerland,  and Yugoslavia. Skynxnex (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - per COMMONSENSE and the fact that the nominator doesn't know what they are talking about (why mention WP:LEAD?! entirely irrelevant to notability) and they haven't done a BEFORE. A quick Google search brings up thousands of results, including this which confirms over 170 games in the Swiss top division, plus multiple cup and continental games. The topic is clearly notable; needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 21:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per above. I found, , , , , and , among many many more sources. Defitneolty has offline sources also, having played over 170 games in the Swiss Super League in extensive pro career. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: @Brachy0008, you might find this guideline useful when nominating articles for deletion: WP:BEFORE. We judge whether to keep articles based on their WP:POTENTIAL to be improved, not their current state. Cheers! –Vipz (talk) 07:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I’m gonna keep it  Brachy 08  (Talk)  (Contribs)  09:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.