Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvira Fairhurst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. لenna vecia  16:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Elvira Fairhurst

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is simply WP:BIO1E. No notability beyond her crime Niteshift36 (talk) 17:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and as WP:NOTNEWS. The event is not historically notable so no reason for an article on the event either. Qwfp (talk) 18:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NOTNEWS. No reason to believe this any event has any significance beyond a one-off news item. Maybe Wikinews is a better destination. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:1E - she is notable only for the one event, and that one event is not encyclopaedic. Given this lack of notability or encyclopaedic merit this runs the risk of WP:BLP problems. Thryduulf (talk) 19:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect and include in the article on this kind of thing. There must be a list article of some sort, no? ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete for reasons above. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete -- a NN female child abuser, infamouse for a few days. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.