Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvis Depressedly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 18:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Elvis Depressedly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't establish that they meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 13:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 13:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. --MelanieN (talk) 23:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could explain your reasoning a bit more? Earflaps (talk) 19:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:53, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep As creator of the article I may be biased, however, everything in the article is properly cited and there is sufficient coverage of this band to warrant an article. Andise1 (talk) 00:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:MUSBIO on several counts, most simply via coverage. Just looking at the page, there are writeups (some interview, mostly reviews and premieres) in Interview Magazine, Paper Magazine, The Fader, and Stereogum. Earflaps (talk) 19:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.