Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvish Yadav


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Elvish Yadav

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Elvish Yadav is failing WP:GNG and WP:NYOUTUBER. All the news references are about the show Bigg Boss show where he is now a contestant and about the controvercy on the show. Nomadwikiholic (talk) 17:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nomadwikiholic (talk) 17:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet,  and India. Karnataka (talk) 18:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep This notable article proves ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  05:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * All the news reference are written by news desk, there no journalist name. So those news are not independent. And the news reference which is written by journalist that news agency is not reliable. Hence not falling under GNG. Nomadwikiholic (talk) 06:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * When did you check that the news is not independent? See the article once again, I have also corrected it. ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  07:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Filmibeat is not reliable source, Statesmen is reliable but not written by journalist, India Today is reliable source but not written by journalist, Rediff is good but not in-depth coverage, The Print is not reliable source, Republic World is not reliable source. I'd like to refer you WP:ICTFSOURCES to know which is reliable and which is not. Also I would like to refer you to read WP:GNG and recheck those references again. Thanks Nomadwikiholic (talk) 08:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * When you have already started the discussion, now only experienced editors will take this discussion. ––  𝚅𝚁𝙹 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞  09:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: definitely case of WP:TOOSOON, no WP:GNG, No WP:RS QueerEcofeminist🌈  03:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 12:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.