Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elxis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 20:34, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Elxis

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Previously a Prod on the rationale "No evidence that this software meets the notability guidelines." Prod was removed by the article creator. There is a published Official Guide, but I found no reliable 3rd party sources that would establish notability, so I am bringing the article to AfD on the original rationale. (Note: there are also Engineering and Real Estate firms with similar names.) AllyD (talk) 06:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 07:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * keep The lack of forged sources is the evidence of notability for this years old software --Hiddenray (talk) 09:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  02:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Wait, what? How is lack of sources evidence of notability? DarkAudit (talk) 06:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I could find no evidence of notability. There's a book by the software's author but obviously, that doesn't count. More significantly, this German book on content management systems mentions Elxis exactly once, in a table of available software. Elxis was already three years old when the book was written so you'd expect coverage if it was a significant system. Also, this page mentions Elxis in passing to say "Joomla! has the press whereas Elxis does not, even thought it’s deserving of it" — in other words, there are very few sources available, which is pretty much the definition of non-notability. Dricherby (talk) 09:41, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.