Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emailarchitect Email Server


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, G11.  Author blocked, as username suggested s/he was only here for spamming. Blueboy96 22:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Emailarchitect Email Server

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:Note, no reviews found via google. Blowdart | talk 20:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article could be eligible to a speedy delete because it does not assert the significance or importance of the subject (CSD A7). Beyond that, the subject doesn't appear notable, Google hits consist in a long list of download sites with the occasional description. Equendil Talk 21:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.