Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EmanciPET


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

EmanciPET

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article makes no assertion of Notability. Several editors have attempted to improve article, however it remains an orphan ..... Todd #661 09:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, Umm... I dunno, just because. :) I have a soft spot for animals and I'm already going through this same trauma at Articles for deletion/Chako Rescue. I guess i'm just an advocate for animal advocacy articles! Seriously though, I have a hard time deleting non-profit organizations based on no assertions of notability.. they're not TRYING to be notable, they're NOT-FOR-PROFIT... but i dunno... kind of a weak argument, but whatever. Maybe Wikipedia should have a "Commendability" guideline in addition to "Notability"... now that would be nice.  -- OlEnglish (Talk) 10:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly. The test is not the worthiness of the work they do, but whether anyone outside the Austin area is likely to have heard of them.  Google news search yields a fair number of hits - but all that I saw in the results that are from reliable sources seem to be announcements of local events or local coverage. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable admirable local organization even if the name is deceptive. Drawn Some (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.