Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Speedy redirect. There's no need to take redirect proposals to AfD'''. Nick-D (talk) 04:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Embassy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This unsourced stub article is confusing because the essential information is found in Diplomatic mission embassy is another word for this. It was proposed that the article be transformed into a redirect in 2004, since its creation this article has been edited 53 times by 30 users and in the past 20 days seen 99 times a day the other article has been edited 756 times by 474 users and on average over 20 days seen 428 times. There is nothing in this article that does not have its place in the Diplomatic mission article but it is not as complete. We are maintaining 2 articles on the same subject. i propose a redirect. Domdeparis (talk) 05:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect The existing article for Embassy is awful, and Diplomatic mission is a synonym. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.