Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy GolfLinks Business Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  15:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Embassy GolfLinks Business Park

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article fails to meet WP:N and other relevant notability guidelines. References 1 and 3 are primary sources. References 2, 7, 8 do not mention the subject. References 4 - 6 are essentially the same press release. References 9 and 10 only mention the subject peripherally in a list. Rpclod (talk) 20:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as an unlikely solidly notable place. SwisterTwister   talk  06:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a major landmark in Bangalore, which is a major city in India. EGL has played a significant role in the recent history of Bangalore. Multiple sources exist. Biwom (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep It seems to have a highly silly name but it does seem to be a business center in Bangalore. Like the Embassy GolfLinks page says, notable companies residing are Goldman Sachs and IBM. Other Embassy business centers are Manyata Embassy Business Park and Embassy TechVillage. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article seems to have a satisfactory number of WP:SECONDARY sources already. Fiachra10003 (talk) 15:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, most of the sources are not independent and can be discounted. Of those that are in reliable sources, they don't seem to mention this particular park in any depth.  This one, for instance, seems to refer to a much smaller 25 acre site in Chennai, a long way from Bangalore.  This is used to support a sentence about the community on the site, but doesn't actually mention the site at all, instead having a brief press-releasey statement about the developer's corporate responsibility policy.  A much more thorough examination of the sources needs to occur, but I'm not seeing from what's presented here that this is anything other than a garden variety office park.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.