Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Afghanistan, Ankara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Afghanistan–Turkey relations. Tone 16:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Embassy of Afghanistan, Ankara

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. embassies are not inherently notable. this article is unreferenced and contains no claim for notability. LibStar (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Antarctica (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)




 * Merge and Redirect Delete - yeah, the relationship between those two countries might be notable but this building is not. Stalwart 111  02:31, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Afghanistan–Turkey relations. An embassy under normal circumstances would have a strong claim to notability. But this appears to be little more than a diplomatic mission and RS sources don't appear to exist, at least in English. That and there is really nothing here to justify a stand alone article. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * That's a good solution. Stalwart 111  04:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.