Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Belgium in Ottawa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Resurgent insurgent 17:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Embassy of Belgium in Ottawa

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE Svetovid 23:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is apparently either a mistaken nomination or an attempt to change policy. We have many hundred such articles. We have over 40 article in Category:Embassies and High Commissions in Ottawa alone. Many of them are quite substantial articles. If the nom would like to change this situation, the place to go is the Village Pump-- not by deleting an individual one . DGG 00:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Numerous embassy articles are already established e.g. Embassy of Israel in London, Embassy of Ukraine in Washington, etc. and should be considered uniformly notable. Picking and choosing particular nation-to-nation diplomatic missions for deletion would constitute WP:BIAS and therefore violate WP:NPOV. Dl2000 00:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Mentioned articles have some content. This one is just a travel guide entry.--Svetovid 00:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep This article needs to be kept. Perhaps it could be put into the needs improvement category instead, because there is nothing wrong with it, exept for the fact that its a stub. Greenboxed 00:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Needs to be expaneded however, maybe a photo. -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Embassies are notable and just because some don't have long articles doesn't suddenly make them subject to WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE. --Oakshade 07:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, embassies are notable, I would say uniformly. Each is a sovereign extension of its home country. Further, the content is brief but encyclopedic. --Dhartung | Talk 07:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No reason to be deleted whatsoever as embassies are definitely notable.--JForget 23:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, definitely a notable article as embassies are notable and as mentioned there are already many embassy articles. Does need some work but nothing that can't be fixed or improved. Xtreme racer 23:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per all above. GreenJoe 01:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Embassies are definitely notable, and this is most certainly expandable if somebody puts a bit of work into it. Keep. Bearcat 21:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like WP:SNOW in here... 134.117.148.184 23:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.