Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Burundi in Washington, D.C.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Burundi–United States relations. If embassies become inherently notable later, the article may be restored. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 06:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Embassy of Burundi in Washington, D.C.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was the subject of a previous AfD in 2019 (Articles for deletion/Embassy of Afghanistan, Cairo) the result was procedural keep as participants clearly think the mass nomination was inappropriate and wanted the different embassies to be considered individually. The article is solely reliant on primary sources and it should be noted that embassies are not inherently notable. Fails WP:NBUILDING / WP:NORG / WP:GEOFEAT. Dan arndt (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Burundi–United States relations. Dan arndt (talk) 03:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree with @Dan arndt, that this article fails NORG, NBUILDING and GEOFEAT. However, I would push back on whether embassies are inherently notable or not. In short, I'm proposing something like a NEMBASSY policy of inherent notability.
 * Some embassies, like the Brazilian Embassy to Italy have extensive coverage of their building, Palazzo Pamphilj while others had extensive coverage of attacks, but that shouldn't be the minimum bar. Even a short stub like the article above (and it will probably continue to remain a stub), contains vital info that the List of diplomatic missions of Burundi won't contain, with room for more articles/interlinking in the future. Shushugah (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete A search does not find enough to meet WP:GNG, existing policy does grant inherent notable, at this time the only possible choice is delete. If there is a successful push to grant inherent notable to embassies, the article can be recovered. Jeepday (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the bilateral relations article. If there was a picture or discussion of some fabulous state dinner there, a keep or merge would be a go. Bearian (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.