Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Colombia, Abu Dhabi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   divided. For the embassies in countries where there is a corresponding "relations" article, the consensus here is to merge, this is the result for Tel Aviv (Israel), Paris (France), and Rome (Italy).

It is less clear what to do with the other ones, these are Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates), Canberra (Australia), and La Paz (Bolivia). Pburka suggested renaming, I am declining that because if the article is about the embassy, then the title should reflect that. As an AFD closer I am not going to provide the service of writing up a full "relations" article so that we can justify a renaming. There is not a consensus to delete these, so I cannot call that. I will make an editorial judgement here on Embassy of Colombia, Canberra which will be merged to Foreign relations of Australia since the embassy is already covered in that article.

For the Abu Dhabi and La Paz articles I cannot offer a good solution at the moment, and will call those no consensus for the time being that they can be handled through editorial processes. (I suspect that a Bolivia-Colombia relations article could be easily justified as they are both South American counties in relatively close proximity, but that a Colombia-UAE article would be harder to justify.) Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Embassy of Colombia, Abu Dhabi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Simply an address listing, also nominating:
 * Embassy of Colombia, Tel Aviv
 * Embassy of Colombia, Paris
 * Embassy of Colombia, Canberra
 * Embassy of Colombia, La Paz
 * Embassy of Colombia, Rome LibStar (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  19:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  19:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  19:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * What is with all these embassy pages? Anyways, merge and/or redirect to the appropriate pages (bilateral relations, list of diplo missions, whatever). Ansh666 21:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge some:
 * Embassy of Colombia, Tel Aviv to Colombia–Israel relations
 * Embassy of Colombia, Paris to Colombia–France relations
 * Embassy of Colombia, Rome to Colombia–Italy relations
 * – Northamerica1000(talk) 02:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 22:57, 16 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Not delete. Maybe merge as suggested above, maybe listify, but it's good content. -- Y not? 14:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * if you are supporting keep you need to demonstrate how notability is met. LibStar (talk) 02:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * He's supporting basically keeping the content, but not necessarily in this specific form. Ansh666 00:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in depth coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:40, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 20:26, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge all to appropriate foreign relations articles. If foreign relations article doesn't exist, rename the embassy article to Colombia&mdash;XXX relations. Pburka (talk) 02:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.