Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Cote d'Ivoire in Washington, D.C. (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ivory Coast–United States relations. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Embassy of Cote d'Ivoire in Washington, D.C.
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was the subject of a previous AfD (Articles for deletion/Embassy of Cote d'Ivoire in Washington, D.C.) in 2013, the result was redirect/merge to Ivory Coast–United States relations. In 2017 the article was recreated but it still doesn't address the issues for which it was originally deleted, which is that embassies are not inherently notable. Fails WP:NBUILDING / WP:NORG / WP:GEOFEAT. Dan arndt (talk) 11:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to Ivory Coast–United States relations. Dan arndt (talk) 03:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 11:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 11:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 11:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Related discussions:
 * Hrm... ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 04:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect/merge per above Reywas92Talk 00:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete A search does not find enough to meet WP:GNG, existing policy does grant inherent notable, at this time the only possible choice is delete. If there is a successful push to grant inherent notable to embassies, the article can be recovered. Jeepday (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge selectively and redirect (soft) as I've advocated in similar situations. The building itself is not so notable to have its own article, and the target article could be beefed up. Bearian (talk) 19:43, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.