Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of India, Asunción


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to India–Paraguay relations. Anything worth merging is available from the article history. Randykitty (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Embassy of India, Asunción

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:GNG. This embassy does not even exist yet. LibStar (talk) 23:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paraguay-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article passes GNGTEST. This article also passes SNG.
 * As per SNG
 * Organizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards:


 * 1) The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
 * 2) The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization.


 * Let us discuss these two criteria in details -
 * The scope of their activities is national or international in scale.
 * This article is about a diplomatic mission of India to Paraguay. By default topic is international in scale.


 * The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization.
 * Embassy opening announcement comes from the official government site as well as notable media organizations.


 * Apart from that, Dinesh Bhatia is the current Ambassador of India to Paraguay.
 * Ambassador is appointed and Embassy opening plan is announced in multiple sources. Embassies are notable and even general upcoming construction/proposed projects which are well covered by the media do pass notability and they do get dedicated pages.
 * Upcoming tallest buildings under construction pass notability and they do get dedicated articles as well.
 * Upcoming movies do get Wikipedia pages even before theatrical release.
 * Same way, as long as Embassy opening is announced in multiple notable sources - it should be on Wikipedia.


 * In short, As per GNGTEST and SNG, this article should be on Wikipedia.

--AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 01:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the things AbhiSuryawanshi describes, we have relations pages. India-x relations. Standalone articles about these buildings are of no use whatsoever. Geschichte (talk) 16:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I would also like to draw your attention to WP:CONTENTSPLIT. Sometimes two or more distinct topics may share the same base title or similar titles, such as "light", which may refer to electromagnetic radiation, a component that produces light, or spiritual illumination. Sometimes the distinct topics may be closely related, such as Coffea (the plant) and coffee (the product), or thermal energy and heat. Embassy articles have enough content like address, list of Ambassadors, history of diplomatic mission, scholarships given etc. Other sub-articles like list of ambassadors to x country can be redirected/merged into Embassy article. --AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 00:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * To compare light to the above topics is frankly ridiculous. India–Paraguay relations is in no conceiveable way in need of a split. The closing admin will take this into regard. Geschichte (talk) 21:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Sincere apologies for ridiculous comparison. I did not suggest SIZESPLIT but CONTENTSPLIT. Example shared suggests why Content split is done. Let me try to give simple example. We have Country, City, Town articles and even small stub articles are dedicated to small towns and cities. Even within city article, Mayor of city gets separate article and other municipality also gets dedicated page. Same way, x-y relations can have dedicated page along with mention of the Embassy. Embassy page can have its own detailed information like list of ambassadors, local (notable) events and activities hosted by the embassy etc. Ambassador of embassy (if notable) then will get separate page as well. Pages take time to develop over a period of time. As long as basic notability is satisfied - more time should be given to others to develop the article. Even if article stays in stub stage for longer, it is fine as per wiki standards. I hope these examples make sense. --AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 04:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Merge with India–Paraguay relations, Since the building does not exist yet. As explained by Geschichte, the info about the upcoming location should go in a section on the relation page. Venkat TL (talk) 09:38, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable embassy, fails WP:GNG. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 03:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and the subject's failure of WP:SIGCOV. Political projects sometimes fall through, and there is no guarantee that this embassy will ever be built and get staffed/open until it actually happens. Article can always be recreated once the embassy is actually in operation and has sources which pass GNG.4meter4 (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per the support and reasons stated. Utkarsh555 (talk) 14:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:PERX you haven't given your own reasoning to explain how this meets notability. LibStar (talk) 22:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:38, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to India–Paraguay relations as suggested above. The content could be useful but it doesn't need to be in a standalone article. Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The building doesn't even exist, for pity's sake. Stifle (talk) 12:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.