Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of India, Moscow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to India–Russia relations. The discussion has been quite sparse, but from reading the comments, this looks like an outcome all the participants would find acceptable. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Embassy of India, Moscow

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject fails GNG. Efforts to redirect this have failed. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 04:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  07:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, India,  and Russia.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 04:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete article is just a list of ambassadors and not in-depth coverage of the actual embassy. LibStar (talk) 09:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 13:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge as ATD, to List of ambassadors of India to Russia as WP:NOPAGE. Alternate target India–Russia relations. &mdash;siro&chi;o 05:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge to List of ambassadors of India to Russia per siroxo. Darling (talk) 14:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why an embassy article should be merged to a list of ambassadors. Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree. Someone searching the word embassy is not looking for a list of ambassadors. For this reason, I still think deletion is the best option. LibStar (talk) 08:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Liz, it's generally encouraged that lists provide context. If we take a look at a sibling article—List of ambassadors of Russia to India—it does a decent job of providing such context.
 * In this case, part of List of ambassadors of India to Russia is already excerpted into this article and it fits pretty well, so we can continue that approach under the new title with just a bit of finessing. But overall it seems like a natural merge.
 * The alternative is the bilateral relations article, but I think that is a broader topic, so I prefer the ambassadors article for a level of precision. &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge with India–Russia relations. This seems to be the standard way of covering diplomatic missions when the embassies are not notable on their own. I see no reason to deviate from that practice. Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.