Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Italy, Chişinău


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn as now redirected. LibStar (talk) 15:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Embassy of Italy, Chişinău

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Embassies are not inherently notable, and this one has no significant coverage to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 13:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete Agree with nom. Not notable; no third party references. No article in Italian WP (that might give more info). LaMona (talk) 00:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete - fails both WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:GNG. Embassies (mostly just office buildings) are not inherently notable and still need to pass inclusion criteria the same way as everything else.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 00:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep or move to the bilateral relations article on Italy - Romania that is appropriate to have, but may not yet currently exist (or redirect if it exists). I am trying to remember specific similar past AFDs resolved this way. I think it seems to be the case that bilateral relationships are valid topics, so start that and redirect this. -- do  ncr  am  22:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Saint Kitts and Nevis–United Kingdom relations and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines–United Kingdom relations as examples. That said, the relationship in question would need to be notable - not just created as a non-notable redirect target for the sake of inexplicable inclusionism.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 22:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks. So this should be moved to Italy-Moldova relations and expanded.  For example, use http://www.italia.mfa.md/relations-it-md-en/ as a source which identifies Italy as one of the first countries to recognize Moldova, in 1992, and more.  Recent news article (September 1, 2014) is about Italy foreign minister praising Moldova, in http://news.yahoo.com/italys-foreign-minister-praises-moldova-161107386.html.  See many more hits in:


 * And the Embassy of Italy in Chisinau can be mentioned in the article, or not, but the redirect to the article can exist. The redirect can be developed later as a separate article if/when historic notability of the building or whatever merits further discussion than exists comfortably in the bilateral relations article.  Solved, not deleting someone's contribution(s).  AFD not necessary, IMHO, but this is the best resolution given AFD started. -- do  ncr  am  00:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Fine by me, though even that is a redirect to Foreign relations of Italy.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 02:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, i boldly moved the embassy article to Moldova-Italy relations (and re-redirected "Italy-Moldova relations" to there), and put in minimal effort to the article with some links/references copied from the Foreign relations of Italy article. Please do feel free to tag in various ways.  Sorry, Stalwart111 i do expect this is less than you wish for but I believe this resolves the AFD, which can be closed "KEEP" ratifying the revised title of an acceptable topic. -- do  ncr  am  14:13, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.