Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of North Korea, Mexico City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Mexico–North Korea relations. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Embassy of North Korea, Mexico City

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article is just a list of non notable ambassadors and not about the actual embassy itself. Fails GNG and WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 05:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Delete, Keep and Merge/Redirect options. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, perhaps cutting out some unverified information. It seems like embassies should be considered notable per se, but we don't have a specific agreed upon callout for them yet. The sources taken together may not meet SIGCOV. However, if the outcome is to delete, would be preferable to do a partial merge of verified information and redirect to Mexico–North Korea relations. There's some precedence for this. &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you have any in-depth sources that establish notability? LibStar (talk) 09:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No sources, sorry. I am !voting like that because it seems that embassies should probably be considered notable per se. It's not exactly something I'm ready to WP:VP or WP:RFC yet, so I'm more floating the idea. &mdash;siro&chi;o 10:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * There is no inherent notability for embassies. LibStar (talk) 10:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you able to link me to any prior discussion about this? &mdash;siro&chi;o 18:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The fact that they have been previously deleted or redirected demonstrates no inherent notability. LibStar (talk) 22:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Korea,  and Mexico. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Mexico–North Korea relations. Embassies are not inherently notable (as buildings, they need to meet WP:NBUILDING), but I do think that this content could be used to expand the parent article (that on the relations between the two states). — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 03:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Delete. Stub article which is basically a list of non-notable persons. Every person on the list is redlinked as well. ConcentratedCobalt (talk) 00:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Embassies are not inherently notable, and this is just a stub containing a red linked list of non-notable people. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 10:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Mexico–North Korea relations per Red-tailed hawk. Contains cited encyclopedic content that should be preserved, but that content is about the bilateral relationship, not the building. I am sympathetic to siroxo's argument for presumed notability of embassies. But since this article as it stands is not actually about the embassy, I feel that we can perhaps leave that battle for another day. -- Visviva (talk) 17:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.