Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Sweden, Mexico City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  16:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Embassy of Sweden, Mexico City

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. embassies are not inherently notable. This article is merely a list of ambassadors. Also oppose merge as ambassador listings are not included in bilaterals or foreign relations Articles. LibStar (talk) 11:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Embassies and lists of Ambassadors. Embassies are notable buildings in the cities they inhabit.  This is not a particuarly good page but a list of Swedish Ambassadors to Mexico should be retained. MLA (talk) 04:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * no, embassies are not inherently notable. LibStar (talk) 06:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  02:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep It is also a list of ambassadors. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:06, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * a list of ambassadors is not a free pass to notability. LibStar (talk) 08:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Embassy and Ambassador list. MLA is right, the article needs to be improved, but embassies are major landmarks in their cities, as well as major symbols of diplomacy and bilateral relations. Scanlan (talk) 00:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * they may be "major " but they do not have inherent notability. So far none of the keep voters have presented any sources . LibStar (talk) 08:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.