Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Antananarivo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to United States-Country relations articles. The Wordsmith Talk to me 02:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Embassy of the United States, Antananarivo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

These articles say nothing about their purported topic — the embassies of the United States in various African capitals — and as such should be deleted, per ample recent precedent. Biruitorul Talk 16:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages:


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sudan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @CAPTAIN RAJU Not sure why this is deletion sorted for all these other countries? LibStar (talk) 22:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * my mistake I didn't see the other nominations. LibStar (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete all all unnecessary content forks of bilateral relations. Created in a spree of new embassy articles with little actual third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 22:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge all to respective United States–X articles. I don't get why you would make an article about an embassy but then write little to nothing about the embassy and instead write about the history of their diplomacy. There's already an article for that, as well as for the list of ambassadors. Reywas92Talk 14:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge all to their respective "Country–United States relations" article. While I must acknowledge that the rationale provided for the AfD is both insufficient and inappropriate, I am open to the idea of merging and redirecting it to the article specific to their country relations. There is more depth to these articles, and they typically follow a consistent format, much like a novel article would discuss aspects such as reception, characters, and critical reviews. I have also observed previous AfDs of a similar nature, which I deemed to be inappropriate. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to their respective United States – (That Country) articles. There's no need to write about a country's embassy if there is little to no information about it. The country relations article is good enough. 🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈  ) 04:50, 21 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.