Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Kingston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Jamaica–United States relations. Star  Mississippi  01:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Embassy of the United States, Kingston

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article says nothing about the Embassy of the United States in Kingston, and whatever it says about Jamaica–United States relations can be added there. Biruitorul Talk 07:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NotAGenious (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Jamaica,  and United States of America.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  12:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete another unnecessary bilateral relations content fork created in a spree of non notable embassy articles. LibStar (talk) 07:26, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, can be a standalone article given that it meets WP:GNG and that there is coverage specifically about the embassy (as opposed to the bilateral relationship): JO, Radio Jamaica News, JO 2, Jamaica Gleaner, Caribbean Journal, The Washington Post. The article can be further completed with descriptions of the architecture from the architect's website KCCT. Pilaz (talk) 21:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Putting aside the architect’s self-praise, there really isn’t coverage about the embassy building: we have a couple of routine articles about its guards going on strike, one about some colored lights being flashed onto its exterior, another about it closing for a Federal holiday (like every single non-essential Federal building in existence) and one about a guard who admitted taking bribes. None of this in any way amounts to significant coverage of the purported topic. — Biruitorul Talk 21:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pilaz – Kjerish (talk) 23:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 * see WP:PERX. LibStar (talk) 23:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Jamaica–United States relations: the thorough source analysis carried out by the nom has not been refuted--or even addressed--by the "Keep" voters or the PERXs. Fleeting mentions do not add up to SIGCOV. Owen&times;  &#9742;  18:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.