Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Quito


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 04:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Embassy of the United States, Quito

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The scant information on the embassy building (actually the ambassador’s residence), which appears entirely unremarkable, can easily be included in Ecuador–United States relations, of which this is a content fork. Biruitorul Talk 18:23, 9 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Any further thoughts? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge with Ecuador–United States relations: specifically, the sentence about Heather Hodges. The rest is either non-notable or already covered by the target. Owen&times; &#9742;  18:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. Owen&times;  &#9742;  18:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and United States of America.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Some coverage of the current and former buildings of the US embassy in Quito in La Hora, El Universo, El Universo again, and a few words about its design in the Foreign Service Journal. Given the role of the United States in the region, I'm sure some printed material of the architecture of the building must exist in books or printed publications of the pre-internet era, although these online sources should satisfy WP:GNG for now. Pilaz (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep I normally vote delete on this series of US embassies but Pilaz's sources convince me that GNG is met. LibStar (talk) 05:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep. This is at least mainly about the embassy (not just USA-Ecuador relations) and a great deal better than nearly all of these embassy articles. Athel cb (talk) 18:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.