Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embrace Today


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Firstly, can we please desist from using terms like "fanboy" to describe other editors. Secondly, many of the "Delete" opinions here opine that there is not sufficient coverage, but I feel that this view is strongly debunked by the "Keep" opinions which provide such. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Embrace Today

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This type of nomination almost always brings the fanboys out, but. Article has been unsourced for eight years, and citation tagged for six and a half. External links are primary or broken. G-search turns up the usual plethora of blog posts, casual mention, YouTube videos and the like. No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources, fails the GNG.   Ravenswing   00:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 01:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 01:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 01:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets point 5 of WP:BAND through two albums released on the Deathwish Inc. label. Both of these albums have staff reviews at AllMusic and Punknews.org, which also helps to establish notability via the WP:GNG. — sparklism hey! 05:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Is pinknews reliable here? Mhhossein (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Punknews.org is included in the list at WikiProject Albums/Sources, provided they are staff reviews (which these two are). — sparklism hey! 16:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 05:02, 25 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete: Not notable. Googling results in some dispersedly results containing casual mention! It fails WP:GNG. Mhhossein (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Merry Xmas, Embrace Today, you're getting deleted DOCUMENT  ★  ERROR  10:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC via the following coverage:, , , , , , , . --Michig (talk) 07:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – Meets WP:BAND point #1 / WP:GNG per the sources provided by Michig. Also meets point #5 of WP:BAND. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.