Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EmbraerX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Embraer. (non-admin closure) buidhe 19:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

EmbraerX

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be a none notable division of the Embraer. From what I've found in a search they haven't released any products yet and only thing being worked on is still a concept. So this counts as to soon IMO. It also fails for the standards of notability for companies. As nothing except trivial coverage on them comes up in a search. That said, I'd be fine if it was merged to Embraer. It looks like they aren't even mentioned there. Which also speaks to their lack of notability. Adamant1 (talk) 18:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Keep or merge - Keep, or merge to Embraer. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 23:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Embraer. Mccapra (talk) 04:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Embraer. Kevin ( aka L235 · t · c) 16:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Embraer.  HighKing++ 20:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.