Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embroidery by naids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 10:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Embroidery by naids

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only (unreferenced) awards are in local papers; unable to find significant secondary coverage of this (or the parent business—Alternative Stitching Co.— for that matter). Fails WP:GNG and such. — Theopolisme   ( talk )  23:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete It does fail WP:GNG. It also looks like an overly promotional article. Kevin12xd (contribs) 23:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree; totally fails WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Is it some sort of test article? A google search brings up exactly one result - the WP article itself. Stalwart 111  00:06, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, those were my initial thoughts as well. Due to the claim of notability, though, I brought it to AfD—you never know about offline sources, or maybe the creator will chime in. — Theopolisme   ( talk )  00:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Good call. Better a snow-closed AFD than a speedy deletion you're not quite comfortable with. Stalwart 111  00:40, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:V along with WP:CORPDEPTH. I can find no trace of one award grantor. Another appears to be the website of a school's PTA. I can't even find primary sources for the company or its service. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.