Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embry Hills church of Christ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. TexasAndroid (talk) 17:27, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Embry Hills church of Christ

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Someone's removed a prod on this, but this is as deletable an article as I ever saw; only the vaguest assertion of notability, borderline spam, and mainly a laundry-list of members. – iride  scent  18:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete.
 * Significant coverage means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive. [FAILED]
 * Reliable means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability. [FAILED]
 * Sources, defined on Wikipedia as secondary sources, provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally preferred. [FAILED]  A Prodigy   ~In Pursuit of Perfection ~ 19:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete: No references. No sources.  Minimal content. I'm not aware of a specific set of criteria that defines when a religious body is notable. Going purely by WP:ORG it lacks notability.  Going by the website of this organization, there is no difference between this congregation, and any of the other congregations in this non-denomination.jonathon (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I see nothing here to satisfy WP:ORG or WP:N. There is also nothing to satisf WP:CONG which was created as an attempt to have a notability guideline for chiurches and religious congregations, but which did not gain consensus. Edison2 (talk) 21:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.