Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emeka Nwadiora


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Non consensus Keep - although having come to that conclusion on the basis of procedure the strength of the arguments are more leaning to keep because evidence of notability seem to be provided by Eastman. -- VS talk 05:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Emeka Nwadiora

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable radio host. Mr Senseless (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;αlεx•mullεr 00:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. See Google News for newspaper articles that seem to be evidence of notability, as well as Google Scholar   --Eastmain (talk) 00:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 00:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 00:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. If anything, just barely meets the WP:PROF notability standard. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 07:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Weak keep but needs some work Dreamspy (talk) 21:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * weak delete - although this person could be notable being a radio host, this Article will have to go about saying so better. For the life of me I cannot locate his book even though an ISBN is given. And EL #2's context does little to state notability of the Article subject. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  13:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete The book is at OCLC, held in about 100 US libraries. that;'s not all that many for a short academic book on this topic (160 p.)--that makes it an introductory text or reading, not a work of scholarship. Whether he is notable otherwise is another matter, and I have no opinion there DGG (talk) 23:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.