Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emel Aydan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 00:42, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Emel Aydan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant independent coverage of this person. Two bottom references are user generated and the second reference goes to a Wikipedia article (not considered a reliable source). And that Wikipedia article has no relationship to this one. Previously Prodded (with page curation) which was removed  with no improvement to the article. Does not meet GNG or NACTOR. Steve Quinn (talk) 23:29, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, the second reference does not go to an article on Wikipedia. The source is actually a book, whose author has a page here and that's why his name is linked. By the way, as I said in my edit summary before, this person seems to be notable as the most recognized transgender pronographic actor in Turkey. Compared to articles about other such actors, it seems that this one can be kept as well. Keivan.f  Talk 23:35, 29 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - not seeing anything in this poorly sourced article that rises to the claim of being "as the most recognized transgender pronographic actor in Turkey'. Right now you have two brief listings, and two citations from a non-RS (the Turkish equivalent of imdb). Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Onel 5969  TT me 00:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Comment: I wish I can read and evaluate Turkish sources because of those Google Books and News hits. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:54, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I wouldn't have even bothered myself to create an article about her, but when a notable Turkish newspaper such as Milliyet covers her story (1) and a platform such as CNN Türk publishes news about her (2) that's probably an indication of notability. Keivan.f  Talk 04:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete a total lack of independent coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of any notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete the Article because it's not notable and fails GNG.Forest90 (talk) 17:59, 5 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.