Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emerald City Chronicles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 04:37, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Emerald City Chronicles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORG. The coverage of this LARP group begins and ends with a single 2007 item in the Seattle alt weekly The Stranger, totaling 775 words. Keeping an article with only a single source would require a much more significant article, by a much more notable author in a major publication. Dennis Bratland (talk) 03:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete One article is not enough for WP:GNG no matter how significant the source. Hoppingalong (talk) 03:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - The one reference is detailed but it would be insufficient to establish notability. Unfortunately, I'm inclined to delete because I haven't found any significant coverage despite adding "1995" (The Stranger cites this as the formation date), "University of Washington", "ECC" and "Vampire: The Masquerade" to my searches, rather I found results for places named Emerald City or other organisations. Judging by the group's website, it is not surprising there are few sources. A redirect to University of Washington may be possible but there isn't any evidence to suggest the university is affiliated with Emerald City Chronicles. Their website claims they hold meetings at the campus but relying solely with their website would be primary. SwisterTwister   talk  21:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Brianhe (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although the organisation has been covered by one secondary source, a single source isn't enough to qualify as significant coverage. Thus, it fails to meet the WP:ORG criteria. -- xanchester  (t)  00:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete depth of coverage requirements. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:01, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.