Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emerald Moon Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Emerald Moon Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seem notable, at least the sources do not indicate notability GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

American record label. The only notable act on the label is All Time Low, the rest of them does not even have their own articles. Lady Radiator is already on Afd so that isn't notable. And the sourcing is horrible. Actually, there's no sourcing in the article, just external links which do not contribute to notability. All I found during a Google search were the site of the label, the Wiki article and its mirrors, databases like discogs, genius and spirit of rock, lots and lots of trivial mentions, and equally trivial and promotional news about them signing a band. But no reliable sources ever written about their history, activity or anything that would indicate notability. In my opinion, this label is not notable (aside from the fact that All Time Low are signed to them), but prove me wrong. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Delete - Actually, I did find one source which looks reliable, . But that is the only one.  In general, record labels are notable for what they release, but one notable band, and one barely notable band, doesn't exceed my threshold of "roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable."  Therefore this fails WP:GNG, unless additional sources can be found, and WP:NMUSIC.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 03:24, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment This label's profile was raised significantly by the immense success of All Time Low, which became one of the best-selling bands of its genre after it moved on to other labels. I think there may be some more substantial pieces out there focusing on the label's other output in the wake of All Time Low's move to the mainstream, but I'm afraid I don't have them on hand. At the very least, there should be no prejudice to re-creation in the event that this discussion closes to delete. Chubbles (talk) 14:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete  there are no citations at all.  Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.  Did a search to look for reliable references, 4 pages into google I did not see any that would count as reliable. Duncan079 (talk) 18:57, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't find enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.