Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emergent literacy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   03:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Emergent literacy
Seems to violate WP:OR. Also doesn't pass WP:CITE. While there are new forms of teaching taking place, I'm not sure if this is notable enough, so I'll throw in NN as well. If notability / verification of sources can be established, then this may be important enough to keep (I know my school is using a new teaching method, so the idea isn't totally foreign, just that this particular one is not notable) Hobbeslover talk/contribs 03:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator Hobbeslover talk/contribs 03:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * This article appears to just be Elizabeth Sulzby's work, making it a violation of WP:OR. --Rory096 07:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Xyra  e  l  T 16:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, OR, style, CITE. Pavel Vozenilek 01:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.