Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emerson Spartz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge to MuggleNet. bainer (talk) 04:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Emerson Spartz
Subject of article is webmaster of MuggleNet. Although MuggleNet is notable enough, the webmaster is not, particularly since all the information on the page is from the Mugglenet website. The article has numerous photographs that are copyrighted and whose use is questionable, at best. Jtmichcock 20:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep and severe cleanup. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 21:56, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. -&#91;&#91;User:Rhymeless&#124;Tim Rhymeless &#91;&#91;User talk:Rhymeless&#124; (Er...let&#39;s shimmy)]]]] 05:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Updated vote: Delete per nom or weak merge. Even when a website is notable that doesn't make everything associated with it (webmasters, servers, forum members, etc.) notable too. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: vote updated to include merge option after considering Mgm's points on my talk page. The problem with covering webmasters is that, with only the rarest of exceptions, all information about them comes from themselves and their websites rrather than books, academic sources, or mainstream publications.  Since this particular webmaster interviewed Rowling, I guess a certain amount of verifiable information exists.  I trust that only the truly verifiable (and non-trivial) information will be merged when the time comes. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:58, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Opposition to the top two entires. The website is globally noted by distinct fandoms that show interest in its main topic (Harry Potter). So it is entirely just to make the webmaster notible for this achievement and the popularity it has gained. Darlyn Perez 22:04, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge Even if the website of this individual is noteworthy in some respects, this information seems better suited as a sub-section of the MuggleNet article. It just does not seem relevent to have an article on a webmaster, and on their site also. Why not combine the two?  There are obviously numerous successful webmasters out there, it seems irrelevent to have an individual article devoted to each one as well as their website especially for a fansite.


 * Merge any useful information into MuggleNet, although there doesn't seem to be much there. The plethora of pictures is unnecessary. Joyous | Talk 00:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge. Anyone who was personally invited by J.K. Rowling to interview her for the release of book 6 is quite notable in my opinion. The images are likely a copyright issue. All but one or two should be axed. If not kept, it should at the very least be merged. Link to the interview in question is at the Pottercast entry on deletion review - Mgm|(talk) 10:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with MuggleNet and Redirect to that page. There's only the one site he has that has notability and integrating the information in one article makes the most sense.  Jtmichcock 18:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with MuggleNet. feydey 00:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with MuggleNet. But in any case, I hope people will remove some of the family info etc.  It almost seems to border on stalking, or something. -- 71.198.189.142 11:04, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge with MuggleNet. It seems the best way to handle it short of revising the whole page, which would leave us nothing more than a stub :). Initially I'm for the deletion of the article but I think subordinating it within the MuggleNet article would be a good compromise.--Chinfo 12:32, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. When he does something else notable, we can have a breakout article. Gamaliel 00:13, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. 24.224.153.40 20:16, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Please discount this anon vote. They have not provided a reason. - Mgm|(talk) 11:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.