Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emi Chusuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete Any editor who wishes in good faith for a copy of the deleted article for the purposes of determination whether this content can be merged elsewhere is welcome to ask at my talk page. Such a merge would require the article to be restored and redirected for continuation of GFDL attribution. JERRY talk contribs 03:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Emi Chusuk

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article consists almost entirely of plot summary without real-world context or analysis, which breaks WP:NOT, and has no secondary sources to indicate notability per WP:FICT. Google returns only 10 hits that appear to be only non-reliable fansites and the like or unrelated which strongly indicates this topic has never recieved substantial coverage from acceptable secondary sources. As such, it is unlikely any amount of rewriting or improvement can bring the article up to policy by providing real-world significance or establishing notability. Once unencyclopedic, in-universe material is removed (per WP:FICT), there would no content to merge into another article. Doctorfluffy (talk) 04:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete per WP:NOT. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * comment I think this is peripheral enough to be merged somewhere appropriate. Find the right place, and it neednt come to AfD at all. DGG (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  15:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.